Panel Gets Pragmatic About Racial Injustice

0
Clockwise from top left: Rabbi David Saperstein, Robert Siegel, Eddie Glaude and Annette Gordon-Reed | Screenshot by Sophie Panzer

Rabbi David Saperstein thinks the deaths of African Americans due to COVID-19 and police brutality in 2020 acted like a shofar blast to the nation.

“We are at a moment, in terms of race issues in America, where there is a sense of immediacy, a sense of urgency, a sense of moral compulsion, that we have accepted structural forms of racism for far too long,” he said. “And it’s been a wake-up call.”

The director emeritus of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism spoke about racial justice on Feb. 24 during “Global Connections: Navigating the New Abnormal,” a monthly leadership panel organized by American Friends of Rabin Medical Center. Robert Siegel, host of NPR’s “All Things Considered” from 1987 to 2018, served as moderator.

For this month’s topic, “America’s Race Crisis: What to Do About It,” Siegel asked his guests about concrete actions Americans could take to heal the harm caused by systemic racism and white supremacy.

Professor Eddie Glaude, chair of the department of African American Studies at Princeton University, responded with questions of his own.

“What is your conception of justice? What is your idea of a just society?” he asked.

He argued that true equality would only be possible if those in positions of power moved away from a model of racial justice as a philanthropic enterprise or charitable gesture and toward a reimagining of society. Siegel pressed him for examples.

“It could involve a range of actions around criminal justice reform and police reform, supporting the repeal of qualified immunity,” he said. “What I think we need broadly, Robert, is a public infrastructure of care, but that’s a discussion for another time.”

Annette Gordon-Reed, a professor of history at Harvard University and a Pulitzer Prize winner, said white people who wanted to fight racism could support people of color by engaging in conversations about race and inequality with their loved ones.

“It’s a very tough thing to confront family members and friends, people who you love and who you depend upon, when they say things or do things that are racially problematic,” she said.

She said that although it’s not an easy task, the conversations are critical, since people are more likely to take these ideas seriously if they come from those they already know and trust.

Saperstein, who is the former United States Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom, said fighting against gerrymandering and other threats to the Voting Rights Act of 1965 was a crucial step in achieving true equality. He invoked Genesis as a repudiation of racism.

“A whole range of interpretations of the Bible asked, ‘Why would we all be descended from one couple? Why was Adam made from the dust of the four corners of the earth?’ So that none of us can claim that the merit of our ancestors was greater than anyone else’s,” he said.

He expressed concern about the breakdown of bipartisanship in the United States and the threat it posed to the racial justice movement, calling it one of the most dangerous aspects of American political life.

“As you look back, Robert, over the last century, in the 20th century, almost every single achievement of social justice in America happened because of a bipartisan coalition of decency on Capitol Hill, and multiracial, multi-ethnic, multireligious, nonpartisan coalitions in communities across America,” he said.

Siegel also asked the panelists if they believed universal social programs to combat economic inequality, such as public health care, or targeted programs based on the injustices experienced by individual minority groups would be more effective in creating change.

Glaude advocated for a targeted approach in response to the fact that racial inequality was the result of policies that specifically targeted people of color for exclusion and harm. One example was the exclusion of Black people from G.I. Bill benefits that helped build a largely white middle class in the late ’40s and ’50s.

Gordon-Reed argued that both forms of intervention are necessary.

“The advantage of universal [programs] is that you don’t stir people up, and you know everybody gets something, and that’s when you begin the process of knitting the country together, by people sharing something. That’s critical,” she said.

[email protected]; 215-832-0729

Full Meaning of a Half-Shekel

0
Torah scroll
ollega / iStock / Getty Images Plus

By Rabbi Robyn Frisch

Parshat Ki Tisa

Ki Tisa begins with God instructing Moses that when he is taking a census of the Israelite people, everyone 20 or older shall pay a half-shekel. God says: “The rich shall not pay more and the poor shall not pay less than half a shekel” (Exodus 30:15).

This seemingly simple idea, that each Israelite, regardless of their personal wealth, is required to pay a half-shekel for purposes of the census, has much to teach us. For one thing, there’s the essential lesson that everyone is equal in the eyes of God. Of course, the fact that each person is to give the same amount for purposes of the census doesn’t mean that those who have more aren’t at times expected to give more.

In fact, the Torah has a system of tithing (discussed in Numbers 18:21-26), according to which a tenth of one’s produce was to be presented to a Levite, who was to then give a 10th of the first tithe to a kohen (Numbers 18:26). In later times, there were some rabbis who referred to not just a tithe of produce, but also a tithe of money. And to this day, there are many Jews who donate a tenth of their annual income to charity.

But what the law of the half-shekel teaches us is that, while we all have different amounts that we can — and should — contribute to the community, when it comes to being counted, to determining who matters — in the eyes of God, no less — that rich and poor are totally equal. We all count the same.

Another important lesson the command to give half a shekel teaches us is that nobody is fully complete on their own. Rather than being instructed to give a whole shekel, each person is instructed to give a half-shekel. Each person’s half-shekel needs somebody else’s half-shekel to be complete. We’re all dependent on each other. That’s what it means to be part of a community — we’re connected to and dependent upon each other. We all have to give and participate for the community to be fully complete.

Interestingly, these verses from the beginning of our Torah portion were also read as part of the synagogue service just a few weeks ago on Shabbat Shekalim. Shabbat Shekalim is one of the Arba Parshiyot — four special Torah readings instituted by the Sages on four different Shabbats leading up to Purim and Passover. Shabbat Shekalim occurs on the Shabbat before Rosh Hodesh (the new month) of Adar — or in years like this year it falls on Rosh Hodesh Adar. Adar is, of course, the month in which we celebrate Purim.
This means that we read about the requirement to give a half-shekel a couple of weeks before Purim, and we’re reading it again now, just a little over a week after Purim. The idea of the requirement to give a half-shekel teaching us about what it means to be part of a community connects perfectly with the Purim story.

In the Book of Esther, when Mordechai told Esther to go before the king, to “remove her mask,” and reveal to the king her identity as a Jew and ask for her people to be saved, Esther was hesitant at first. She responded to Mordechai that the king hadn’t summoned her for the past 30 days, and anyone who goes before the king without being called will be killed if the king doesn’t hold out his golden scepter to them. Finally, Esther was convinced to go before the king, but she told Mordechai to first: “Go, assemble all the Jews who live in Shushan, and fast in my behalf; do not eat or drink for three days, night or day” (Esther 4:16).

Just as Haman planned to kill all of the Jews of Shushan, Esther wanted all of the Jews in Shushan, rich and poor, to join with her in solidarity before she risked her own life, and the chance to save all of her people by appearing before the king. She recognized that the Jews were stronger when they all banded together. And ultimately, she was successful. Not only did the king extend his golden scepter when Esther appeared before him, but the Jews of Persia were given the right to assemble and fight for their lives.

Queen Esther inherently knew what our Torah portion Ki Tisa teaches us. Each of us as Jews matter equally, regardless of our wealth. And together, each Jew is part of something much larger than our individual self. We’re part of a community (and I would argue that this also applies to spouses and partners of Jews who may not themselves be Jewish, but who have chosen to include their lot with ours) and each of us, like Queen Esther, must do our part to help the Jewish community not just survive, but to thrive.

Rabbi Robyn Frisch is the director of the 18Doors Rukin Rabbinic Fellowship and the spiritual leader of Temple Menorah Keneseth Chai in Northeast Philadelphia. The Board of Rabbis is proud to provide diverse perspectives on Torah commentary for the Jewish Exponent. The opinions expressed in this column are the author’s own and do not reflect the view of the Board of Rabbis.

Thirty Years: A Match Made by the Exponent

1
Sherri and Michael Leon.       Photo by Rebecca and Alexis Leon

“It was bashert!” said Sherri Leon, co-proprietor of Noshes by Sherri, describing the journey to find her husband Michael.

While a student at pharmacy school, Leon placed a personal ad in the Jewish Exponent.
“My roommate and I just did it for the heck of it — we literally said, ‘2 SJFs seeking 2 SJMs.’ We got, like, 50 replies through the P.O. box — remember this was 30-some years ago — we went on a ton of dates. Michael’s letter stood out because he was a pharmacist, and he loved skiing and tennis, just like me, but it took months to meet just because of scheduling conflicts.”

Sometime in those two months, Leon went to her travel agent’s house to pick up airline tickets and destiny loomed.

“She was a yenta so, of course, she asked me who I was dating. I told her about the personal ad thing and that there was one guy who I hadn’t met yet but seemed really promising,” she said. “She asked his name, I said, ‘Michael Leon’ and she shrieked. She ran out of the room, popped a video into her VCR and showed me Michael. He was the best man at her nephew’s wedding.”

Leon liked what she saw, so she called her future husband, then later went on a date to Bennigan’s.

“It was an instant connection. We talked nonstop, ended up closing the place down; they asked us to leave,” she said. “We kept talking in the parking lot, and we are still talking!”
Michael Leon proposed sometime later.

“We were going skiing up to Killington. He insisted on stopping at a hardware store on the way. I was, like, why? We finally got there. It was a foggy, gray day, and Michael raced off the lift and whizzed down the hill. I was yelling, ‘Where are you?’ He yelled to come down, and when I got there he had written in blue contractor’s tape, ‘Sherri, will you marry me?’

That’s why he stopped at the hardware store. It was beautiful from day one.”

Thirty years, three kids and two successful pharmacy careers later, the two launched a food business. Michael Leon is retired now, but Sherri Leon still works full time behind the pharmacy counter. The kids help with the business — although they are all professionals in their own right.

The business grew out of a social media quest. A woman was searching for Jewish apple cake for her brother’s birthday. She was referred to Sherri Leon, whose apple cake was legendary. She made the cake, was informed that the birthday boy, a renowned foodie and apple cake aficionado, deemed it the best he’d ever had, and pretty soon a business was born.

Their motto is “Love at first bite.”

“The first time we served up a knish to a customer, he took a bite and said, ‘This is love!’ so it kind of stuck,” Michael Leon said. “Everyone wants more, they’re addictive. Our knishes are lighter and smaller than the typical ones you might see in a deli, which, to me, can sometimes be like lead.”

Many of the recipes are passed down from the family. Michael’s mother, “Bubbe,” was known for the best matzah balls, sponge cake and all sorts of traditional Jewish fare. His grandmother lived in Israel, and he fondly recalls enjoying her poppy seed cookies on the family’s annual visits. The cookies are now on the menu, along with a variety of other sweet and savory items that vary with the season and holidays.

The couple uses local produce whenever possible and even picks their own at nearby orchards and farms during harvest time.

Noshes by Sherri is a regular fixture at many local farmers markets and recently joined the Sisterly Love Food Fair, a consortium of women-owned food businesses that banded together to sell their wares collectively around the region. The baked goods also are available to order via their website noshesbysherri.com.

The following recipe is Bubbe’s kugel and is still kept on a 3-by-5 card in the metal file card box with the other recipe cards from their mothers and grandmothers. This one was typed by Bubbe herself on her manual typewriter.

Kugel served. Photo by Rebecca and Alexis Leon

Bubbe’s Noodle Kugel
Serves 8-10

6 eggs
1 pound thin egg noodles
8 ounces Philadelphia cream cheese
16 ounces Breakstone cottage cheese
16 ounces Breakstone sour cream
1½ cups of sugar
¼ cup cinnamon/sugar mix

Cook the noodles and drain them.

Combine the eggs, sugar, sour cream, cottage cheese and cream cheese in a mixer.

Add that into the noodles and top it with the cinnamon sugar mix.

Bake at 350 F for 1½ hours.

Hand Warmers and Hamantaschen at Chabad

0
The Megillah is read at Chabad Young Philly on Feb. 25. Photo by Jesse Bernstein

I was among a group of about 30 people who gathered for a Megillah reading on Feb. 25 at Chabad Young Philly at Broad and Catharine streets.

Billed as “COVID-friendly (unfriendly to the virus!),” the evening did indeed bear the indelible marks of the pandemic: masks, hand sanitizers, individually wrapped food and spaced seating. We were outside on a breezy night under a nearly full moon. Hot cider and hand warmers abounded, which created jugglers of us all, as the desire to warm oneself conflicted with the duty to follow along as the Megillah was read and to grogger away when appropriate. Soft yellow lights lined the backyard fence.

Aside from the story of Chanukah, the Book of Esther might be the Jewish story with the greatest distance between the text and its commentaries and the version taught to children.

Ahasuerus, in my Jewish day school education, was nothing more than a bumbler who loved two Jews, and then his Jewish subjects; Vashti’s head was simply separated from her crown, rather than from her entire body; and I can’t say I recall too much discussion of the Jews doing a preemptive strike on the goyim in each of the 127 provinces.

As I watched costumed children preparing to make all the sanctioned noise they could, I wondered if the last year had registered for them in the way that approaching the text of Esther as an adult did for me. Were stories about the competence and goodwill of the adults in charge revealed to be for children?

The Megillah reading was done with great speed, and the groggering was equally competent; rare was the premature grog. We heard about Haman, the wicked son of Hammedatha the Agagite himself, and we heard about the brave and beautiful Esther. We joined voices to read a few verses aloud together, and sang together when the reading was completed. We filed out of the backyard slowly at the conclusion, dropping off our Esther texts for sanitation and pocketing hamantaschen for the road. We were even sent on our way with mishloach manot, each in a bright purple box.

The whole affair was less than 40 minutes; there was some cleaning to be done, and two more shifts would be coming to hear the Megillah read that evening.

It feels good to write “we” when “we” refers to a group of people who were gathered together in person. It’s not something I’ve often had the privilege to do in the last year. It’s a “we” with depth because it is a “we” with roots in the real world. For an evening, “we” could think of ourselves as a group of people brought together by intention, rather than as a herd to be immunized, a voting bloc to be courted, camps to be unified or a data point in a spiking graph.

The writer Gabriel Winant posed some scary questions in an essay last December: Has the last year of savagely rendered isolation and violence revealed that we do not, as Margaret Thatcher once said, live in a society? Has the pandemic hastened the decline of our mutual sense of responsibility?

Impossible to answer. But at Chabad that night, I saw a group of people who answered in the negative, who seemed to say, in one voice, that “society” might not be something one can opt in or out of. It might just be an ecstatic state, one that requires lots of people to do small things together every day, until the feeling is as real as the hamantaschen in your hand.

[email protected]; 215-832-0740

Pa. State Rep. Dan Frankel Reintroduces Hate Crime Legislation

0
State Rep. Dan Frankel represents a district that includes Squirrel Hill, the Pittsburgh neighborhood where a gunman murdered 11 congregants at the Tree of Life building in 2018. | Courtesy of PA House of Representatives |

For years, Pennsylvania state Rep. Dan Frankel has been trying expand the protections offered by the Ethnic Intimidation Act, the Pennsylvania law that effectively created “hate crimes” as a category of crime in the Commonwealth.

In January, Frankel reintroduced a package of bills that are intended to impose stiffer penalties on those convicted of hate crimes, offer new educational opportunities to offenders and police officers, and allow students to report hate crimes anonymously.

Could 2021 be the year? Could Frankel’s efforts finally bear fruit?

At the very least, the idea that hate crime legislation might be worth a closer look is on people’s minds.

“It’s been timely, for a lot of reasons,” Frankel said.

Frankel, who is Jewish, represents a district that includes Squirrel Hill, the Pittsburgh neighborhood where a gunman murdered 11 congregants at the Tree of Life synagogue building in 2018. His hate crime bills were originally introduced in 2019, but his efforts to expand and strengthen hate crime law began much earlier.

In 2002, the state legislature passed an amendment to the Ethnic Intimidation Act, adding LGBT people as a protected class. Challenges to the amendment came quickly, according to The Philadelphia Inquirer, after five people protesting a gay rights festival were charged with hate crimes in 2004.

In 2007, the Commonwealth Court struck down the expansion, and the state Supreme Court upheld the decision the following year. Since then, Frankel has been a part of a group of legislators trying to get LGBT people back under state protection.

The 2018 mass shooting at Tree of Life “reinvigorated this effort,” Frankel said. “In addition to that, we looked at some other areas with respect to hate crimes that we thought needed to be strengthened and addressed. So this package went beyond just the amendments to the Pennsylvania Ethnic Intimidation Act, and went further.”

In 2019, Frankel was one of the co-sponsors of a hate crime package — House Bills 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 — that sought to:

  • Impose stiffer penalties for those convicted of hate crimes, including those targeted because of their sexual orientation, gender or gender identity;
  • Mandate educational courses for those on probation or parole for ethnic intimidation;
  • Provide more training for police officers to properly identify hate crimes;
  • Require postsecondary institutions to offer anonymous online reporting options for students and employees.

Frankel was the primary sponsor for 2010, 2011 and 2013, while state Rep. Ed Gainey, of Allegheny County, sponsored 2012. In the Pennsylvania Senate, similar bills have also stalled.

Stiffer penalties for hate crimes, Frankel said, would make it clear that such crimes are committed not only against an individual, but against whole groups.
“For instance, somebody who just put some graffiti on a stop sign at an intersection, versus somebody who spray-paints a swastika on a mosque or a synagogue, that needs to be differentiated very, very clearly in terms of the penalties,” Frankel said.

Though the bills had support from then-Pennsylvania House Speaker Mike Turzai, the COVID-19 pandemic rearranged the priorities of the legislature. Frankel’s bills were not among them.

He gave it another roll in the fall of 2020, but his push was unsuccessful.
“Hateful actions continue to be perpetrated against our neighbors simply because of who they are,” Frankel told the Pittsburgh Jewish Chronicle in October. “We know that these types of interactions are increasing, and it is time for our legislature to take action.”

The bills were crafted in concert with the Coalition Against Hate, a multi-ethnic ecumenical group of leaders from across Pennsylvania. The group includes Gainey and state Senate Democratic Leader Jay Costa, also of Allegheny County. Before his primary defeat in 2020, former state Sen. Larry Farnese, of Philadelphia, was also a sponsor of the Coalition’s legislation.

Leaders from the Board of Rabbis of Greater Philadelphia, the Jewish Federation of Greater Philadelphia and regional representatives of the American Jewish Committee and the Anti-Defamation League worked with other leading minority groups to iron out the details of how to best protect one another with hate crime legislation.

Crucially, Frankel said, the Coalition Against Hate counts the Pennsylvania Catholic Conference among its stakeholders.

“It was a huge step to get the Catholic Conference to the table, to basically endorse the idea that we ought to be identifying hate crimes against people because of their sexual orientation, gender identity and expression,” Frankel said.

Though the Coalition Against Hate’s work predates ADL Regional Director Shira Goodman’s time with the organization, she emphasized that the effort reflected the organization’s fight against hate.

Though Jewish people are already a protected class in Pennsylvania, “We are not content to have an uninclusive bill in Pennsylvania, because everybody in Pennsylvania should be safe from being targeted that way,” Goodman said.

Whether the bills make it into law this time remains to be seen, though Frankel told the CBS affiliate in Pittsburgh that he expects bipartisian support.
Goodman is cautiously optimistic.

“I think it’s hard to predict in Pennsylvania what will be the thing that moves people. I would have thought after Tree of Life, when these bills were introduced, that they would have had a good shot of getting the hearing and bipartisan support,” Goodman said. “I think that the partisan divides in our legislature make that very difficult. However, we and Rep. Frankel and other partners in the coalition are talking to people on both sides of
the aisle.”

[email protected]; 215-832-0740

The Jewish Federation Helps JCHAI Serve Disability Population During Pandemic

0
Jordyn Dannenbaum at the beach Courtesy of Cindy Dannenbaum

Unemployment has been at an all-time high during the pandemic. Many of those impacted include people with disabilities, like Jordyn Dannenbaum.

Dannenbaum, who has Down syndrome, had to resign from her job in a nursing home due to safety concerns related to COVID-19, and left her second job when the office closed down around the same time. Fortunately, Dannenbaum has Judith Creed Horizons for Achieving Independence, an organization that serves people with disabilities by providing them with transitional housing, socialization opportunities, life skills training and more.

“Some clients lost their jobs, our in-person programs went virtual, getting groceries delivered to people in apartments became impossible, because those platforms were inundated by the general population. Plus, the cost of food skyrocketed,” said Stacy Levitan, JCHAI’s executive director. “Locating PPE was a nightmare, and since many of our clients who kept their jobs were essential workers, we also had to worry about keeping our staff safe.”

A few weeks into the pandemic, JCHAI received close to $50,000 from the Jewish Federation’s Emergency Relief Fund. Those dollars offset the increasing price of food and supported programs through their transition to virtual platforms. JCHAI also received PPE, including clear masks for those with hearing impairments to read lips and those on the autism spectrum to better interpret social cues relayed through facial expressions.

“During those early days, we had so many problems competing for our attention and fundraising was difficult for individual agencies,” Levitan said. “The Jewish Federation has become very sophisticated when it comes to figuring out where to direct dollars on an emergency basis, and they do a really good job working closely with those of us in the community to shepherd funding where it’s needed most.”

In the earliest days of the pandemic, JCHAI received a toilet paper donation from the Jewish Federation — a precious commodity at the time. Levitan and her staff also participated in webinars with health experts, hosted by Jewish Federations of North America and the local Jewish Federation, and relied on the Jewish Federation to guide them through emergency loan applications.

When Levitan reflects on 2020, she speaks of JCHAI clients who have worked through the pandemic. Many are essential workers, employed by grocery stores, hospitals, schools and other businesses.

“It’s been really heartening to see that people with disabilities have been just as integral to keeping our communities going as any other essential worker,” said Levitan, beaming with pride.

Matthew Hollin outside of Lankenau Medical Center, where he has worked throughout the pandemic Courtesy of Cristy Hollin

Cristy Hollin, whose son Matthew has Fragile X syndrome and is a JCHAI client, could not agree more. Matthew works in the linen room at Lankenau Medical Center and has remained employed throughout the pandemic.

“We’re just beyond proud of how he’s handled the pandemic,” said Hollin, who is the co-chair of the Jewish Federation’s Committee for Social Responsibility. “We hope he continues to maintain a full-time job and keeps learning and growing and building friendships because that’s just as good as it gets.”

While the pandemic has added another layer of difficulty on a population that already faces countless challenges, the JCHAI community takes comfort knowing that the Jewish Federation is there for them. JCHAI continued to feel that support from a recent grant of $100,000 through the Jewish Federation’s health and human services initiative with JFNA.

“Psychologically, it’s just wonderful knowing we’re not alone,” Levitan said. “We have those who support us, like the Jewish Federation. The reality is no matter how tough it gets, we never have to go through it by ourselves.”

Community Briefs: Civil Rights Photos, Yiddish Forverts Editor Talk

0
A protest in Philadelphia in the 1960s photographed by Jack T. Franklin Photo by Jack T. Franklin

Einstein’s ‘Capturing Hope’ Exhibit Opens
“Capturing Hope,” a photography exhibit depicting the civil rights movement, is on display at Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia.

The exhibit, which is free and open to the public, features photos on loan from the African American Museum in Philadelphia that were taken by Jack T. Franklin. The noted photographer donated his collection of more than 500,000 negatives to the museum in 1986.

The collection comprises photos of the civil rights movement and numerous, cultural and political events in Philadelphia’s African American community during his lifetime.
“Capturing Hope” is divided into three themes: “Freedom Isn’t Free,” which features the civil rights movement; “Martin Luther King Remembered”; and “From Philadelphia to D.C., the March to Washington.”

The exhibit, which opened in February to commemorate Black History Month, is located in the Community Corridor in the Tower Building — the main building on the Einstein Medical Center Philadelphia campus at 5501 Old York Road. Visitors are required to wear a face mask and practice social distancing.

Rabbi Sussman to Host Zoom Talk with Yiddish Forverts Editor
Senior Rabbi Lance J. Sussman of Reform Congregation Keneseth Israel will host a Zoom talk at 7:30 p.m. on March 10 with Rukhl Schaechter, the editor of Yiddish Forverts, which is described as the only remaining Yiddish newspaper outside the Chasidic Jewish world.

Bronx-raised Schaechter is the first woman as well as the first person born in the United States to hold the position of editor; she is likely also the first Sabbath-observant Jew to edit the paper, which dates to 1897. She is the daughter of Yiddish linguist Mordkhe Schaechter, and her aunt was Yiddish poet and songwriter Beryle Schaechter-Gottesman.

During the talk with Sussman, she will discuss how she started working at Yiddish Forverts as a reporter in 1998, among other topics. She was named editor in 2016 and has been credited for increasing the publication’s online outreach.

For more information about the event and a link to attend, email: [email protected].

— Compiled by Andy Gotlieb

Philly’s Israeli Film Fest Opts for Free ‘Theater’ Model This Year

0
image of man in yarmulke wearing a rainbow flag with other people holding signs in hebrew
A scene from the documentary “Marry Me However,” which is part of the Israeli Film Festival. | Courtesy of Go2Films

Though this year is technically the 25th anniversary edition of the Israeli Film Festival of Philadelphia, this spring’s version will take a different tack.

Rather than spoil the chance to celebrate a quarter-century of bringing Israeli film to Philadelphia, festival organizers are treating this edition as a one-off. They hope to have a proper celebration of 25 years in March 2022.

On top of that, admission to this year’s festival, which will screen online, will be free.

“We decided that, given the miserable state of people’s lives, because of COVID, we wanted to kind of pay it forward, for lack of a better word,” IFF founder and Artistic Director Mindy Chriqui said.

It wasn’t an easy decision, but it appears to have paid dividends. Requests for tickets have been high enough that “if we had to actually accommodate everybody in the theater, we probably would not have been able to,” she said.

Though it’s not the version of the festival that Chriqui her team would like to be putting on, this year’s slate of films reflects an enduring commitment to the core mission.

“We cannot do the festival, but we are committed to bringing to our audience and our supporters the latest and the newest Israeli releases,” said Hava Grunwald, the festival coordinator.

The 2020 edition of the festival was cut short, just one weekend into its March run. Chriqui and the IFF agonized over the movies that their audiences would never get to see; finally, last fall, they were able to send out links for online viewing.

It was good practice for this spring. The organizers have opted for a “theater” model, whereby viewers watch movies at the same time as others, rather than at their convenience.

“We wanted them to feel part of this whole festival,” Chriqui said.

The festival began on Feb. 25 and continues for eight weeks. The IFF sends emails each Thursday at noon with links to contemporary Israeli films. Interested viewers should visit iffphila.com and sign up for emails under “Join” to receive links to each movie.

Several movies will feature options to sign up for Zoom discussions with the creators and subjects (six out of the eight movies are documentaries). However, that schedule hasn’t been finalized.

Here is just a taste of the festival’s programming.

‘A Lullaby for the Valley,’ directed by Ben Shani, April 1
At the beginning of the documentary “A Lullaby for the Valley,” the painter Eli Shamir seems perfectly suited to his primary subject, the Jezreel Valley: He’s unceasingly warm, slyly magnetic and generally amused at the prospect of his own existence. It’s as if he’s saying, with an air of disbelief, “I, Eli Shamir, son of a farmer, have my paintings sold at unthinkable rates to dealers the world over? What can you do but laugh at such fortune?”

It’s a good thing he starts out that way, because Shamir, in his late 50s when filming began in 2011, was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in 2014. Over the next several years, as director Ben Shani chronicles, Shamir confronts his declining physical abilities each day. For someone who describes his work as an attempt to “capture the world” with the movement of his wrist, it begs the question: What if he can’t move his wrist the right way?

Shani followed Shamir the artist and Shamir the man, bridging any distance between the two. Shani has an eye for Shamir’s tiny dignities, from the respect he gives to his models to his desire to paint approachable, idyllic scenes. When Shamir’s physical decline worsens, Shani is with him in hospital scenes that are darkly funny.

Shani declares his admiration for Shamir’s work in one of the movie’s first scenes, but it would be apparent even if he didn’t say it. The shots of life on Shamir’s farm seem to be cinematic companions to Shamir’s art; the painter is lucky to have someone convey the way he sees the world with such fidelity.

The official premiere of this film is in April; this screening represents a sneak preview.

‘Marry Me However,’ directed by Mordechai Vardi, March 18
Rabbi Mordechai Vardi’s film about the lives of LGBT Israelis who entered heterosexual marriages for religious reasons is a tale of both confusion and clarity. The problem for many of the documentary’s subjects is that there are legions of people around them who seek to muddle what is clear and simplify what cannot be.

For those who stay with a partner they’re not attracted to or who decide on divorce, there are few they can approach for advice. Conversely, when it comes to sexual attraction — the one subject they’re certain about — there are more than enough conversion “therapists” hawking dubious medical and moral claims.

Some of the film’s subjects are supported by their families, but many are not. The opening scene of a gay man’s wedding to his wife — in which the melancholy of the groom contrasts with the merriment of the revelers — plays like a man being led to his execution.

What the subjects of “Marry Me However” are often left with, then, is each other, and the growing ranks of psychologists and rabbis who try to facilitate their acceptance in Israeli society. Vardi’s movie doesn’t have to work hard to make the case that it will be a long road. But the instances of reconciliation we see make it clear that it will be worth it.

[email protected]; 215-832-0740

‘Shtisel’ Season 3 Netflix Release Date Announced

0
Dovale Glickman, left, and Michael Aloni in a scene from Season 3 of “Shtisel.” (Courtesy of Yes Studios via JTA.org)

By Gabe Friedman

Season 3 of the hit haredi Orthodox drama series “Shtisel” will debut on Netflix on March 25, Israel’s Yes Studios announced Tuesday.

The first two seasons of the show, which follows members of an Orthodox family in Israel, became popular with audiences around the globe, Jewish and non-Jewish, after being distributed by Netflix. The third season will be the first branded as a Netflix Original.

“This season was made possible thanks to the love and support we received from fans and viewers throughout the world,” producer Dikla Barkai said in a news release. “We are thrilled to be able to bring the ‘Shtisel’ family to the warm embrace of global audiences in time for Passover.”

Production on the season began after Israel’s first COVID-19 lockdown last year, and the show just finished its initial run on Israeli TV. The narrative picks up four years after the conclusion of the events of the previous season.

ICC Launches War Crimes Investigation of Israelis and Palestinian Terrorists

0
Fatou Bensouda, the International Criminal Court’s prosecutor, at the court in The Hague, Netherlands, July 8, 2019. (Eva Plevier/AFP via Getty Images via JTA.org)

By Cnaan Liphshiz

AMSTERDAM — Prosecutors at the International Criminal Court said they have launched an investigation against Israelis for alleged war crimes against Palestinians.

ICC Prosecutor Fatou Bensouda announced the formal initiation of an investigation Wednesday into “the Situation in Palestine,” a statement said, dealing a blow to years of efforts by Israeli governments to avoid such a probe. The move gives the Palestinian Authority a victory in its attempts to bring about greater international scrutiny of Israeli actions in the context of the Palestinian-Israeli dispute.

According to the statement, the investigation will cover crimes within the court’s jurisdiction that are alleged to have been committed since June 13, 2014.

The ICC has not identified individual suspects. In previous cases, the court has prosecuted high-ranking soldiers and politicians.

Last month, a three-judge panel of the Netherlands-based tribunal ruled that the court has jurisdiction to investigate Israelis and Palestinian terrorists, including from Hamas, for alleged crimes during the 2014 Gaza War because the Palestinian Authority may be considered a state in the context of the court, The Associated Press reported.

The ICC has been examining a case brought by the Palestinian Authority since 2015 and Bensouda, the chief prosecutor, has said that her preliminary probe into the request to open a case indicated war crimes had occurred.

Israel both dismissed the allegation and contested the court’s jurisdiction, arguing the court is not certified to investigate Israeli actions because it is among the dozens of countries that have not agreed to grant the court jurisdiction on their territory. The Palestinian Authority, Israel argued, was beyond the court’s jurisdiction as well since it is not a member state of the United Nations.

The ICC, which is based in The Hague, “only has jurisdiction over petitions submitted by sovereign states. But there has never been a Palestinian state,” Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in 2019.

On Feb. 5, however, a three-judge panel determined that Palestine qualifies as a state. One of the judges dissented.

The International Criminal Court, which is not part of the United Nations, was established in 2002 by dozens of U.N. member states that signed and ratified the Rome Statute. The statute gives the court a mandate to bring to trial individuals — but not countries or organizations — who are alleged to have committed genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes but have evaded justice because the relevant judiciaries in their home countries are unable or unwilling to duly prosecute them.

Israel has contested an investigation into the activities of its citizens also because it has a functioning judiciary.

Individuals convicted of war crimes by the ICC are subject to warrants for their arrest by signatory countries.