Monday, May 30, 2016 Iyyar 22, 5776

New Congress Loses Pro-Israel Pillars

January 2, 2013 By:
Ron Kampeas, JTA
Posted In 


Enlarge Image »
Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.)

WASHINGTON — When the new Congress convenes in January, it will be missing several longtime pillars of support for Israel on Capitol Hill.
Gone from the House of Representatives will be veteran Jewish Reps. Howard Ber­man (D-Calif.), the ranking member on the House Foreign Affairs Committee; Gary Ackerman (D-N.Y.), the ranking member on the committee’s Middle East and South Asia Subcommittee; and Steve Rothman (D-N.J.), a point person on funding Israel’s missile defense efforts. Absent from the Senate will be Sen. Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.).
Jewish politics watchers agree that the departures represent a loss of pro-Israel brainpower of a scope not seen for years.
“People like Berman and Ackerman — both Congress and the pro-Israel community will miss having people of that seniority who know issues inside and out,” said Jeremy Ben-Ami, president of the dovish Israel policy group J Street, referring to the top senior Democrats on the Foreign Affairs Committee, each of whom served in Congress for 30 years.
Martin Frost, a Jewish Democrat who represented Texas in Congress from 1979 to 2005, said that Berman’s departure is “a real loss.” But he expressed confidence that support for Israel would remain strong in Congress. “You always hate to lose anyone, but I think we’re in good shape,” Frost said.
The reasons for the departures vary: Berman and Rothman were defeated in intra-party battles sparked by redistricting, while Ackerman and Lieber­­man are retiring. Other notable departures of Jewish pro-Israel lawmakers include Reps. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), a leading liberal who is retiring, and Rep. Shelly Berkley (D-Nev.), a hawkish voice on Israel who was defeated in her bid for a Senate seat.
A staffer for a House Democrat said the loss of veteran Jewish lawmakers is significant in that their colleagues looked to them for guidance on Israel-related issues. “They connect the dots, they look at the big board and see how a leader on a particular issue votes,” said the staffer, who asked not to be identified, citing Capitol Hill protocol. “There are a lot fewer data points now for them to work with.”
The staffer said that top Jewish lawmakers would gain support for Israel by being leaders in other areas embraced by Demo­crats. “The real concern I have is how those older members functioned in the caucus as a whole — that because they were good Democrats, what they favored was seen as good for Democrats,” the staffer said.
Multiple sources cited as a particular blow the loss of Ber­man, whose long congressional career is coming to an end following his defeat by fellow Jewish incumbent Rep. Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) in a bitterly contested race. “Howard Berman had the ability to work across the aisle,” said Douglas Bloomfield, an opinion columnist for Jewish media outlets who in the 1980s was the legislative director of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. “He was a legislator as well as a policy person. He was a respected voice, people took him seriously.”
Berman was seen as critical to brokering the deal that achieved overwhelming congressional backing for enhanced Iran sanctions in 2010. He worked closely with the Obama administration on the issue. “Howard was beloved by everybody,” said Ira Forman, who headed the Obama campaign’s Jewish outreach efforts and is a former president of the National Jewish Democratic Council. “AIPAC people like him, people who were dovish like him.”
Also on the Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-Fla.), who is considered a strong ally of Israel, is relinquishing her post as the committee’s chairwoman, as required under the House Republican Caucus rules that limit how long its members can serve in committee leadership roles.
Even with the loss of so many veteran pro-Israel voices, observers stress that there are still devoted friends of Israel in key congressional positions.
They include Jewish pro-Israel stalwarts like Rep. Nita Low­ey (D-N.Y.), who now leads Democrats on the powerful Appropriations Committee, and Rep. Eliot Engel (D-N.Y.), who is replacing Berman as the top Democrat on the Foreign Affairs Committee. “Engel knows his stuff very well, he is similar to Shelley [Berk­ley] in being a real pro-Israel stalwart,” Forman said.
Engel at times has taken a more critical stance than Ber­man toward the Obama administration’s approach to Israel.
Newer members also may find themselves taking more of a leadership role on Israel issues. Rep. Ted Deutch (D-Fla.), elected in 2010, already is a leader on Iran sanctions issues, and Rep.-elect Brad Schneider (D-Ill.) has strong ties to Chicago-area chapters of pro-Israel groups. “The longer I’ve been in Congress, the more I see that Congress is a living body. We lose some good people and we gain some good people,” said Engel.
Engel said there is “an excellent crop” of incoming freshmen, and that “those of us who are around have been around for a while. We’re eager to carry the torch.”
But Bloomfield said that an emerging generation of Democrats could spell long-term changes in the structure of two-party support for Israel.
Younger Democrats, he said, do not naturally come by the sympathies Israel accrued when it was under attack in its earlier decades. Additionally, Bloomfield said that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netan­yahu’s hawkish policies alienate a demographic that favors Israeli-Palestinian reconciliation.
“The generation that’s leaving — these are guys who grew up in the formative years of Israel and understand what the struggle was,” Bloomfield said. “They are being replaced by a post-1967 generation who know not a threatened Israel — who know a muscular Israel.”
But Engel said he did not perceive a significant shift in how lawmakers relate to Israel. “There are handful of people in the Democratic Party that see things in a different light and there are a handful of people in the Republican Party that see things in a different light,” he said. “The overwhelming majority understands that Israel is a strategic ally and the United States has a stake in the Middle East in the survival of Israel.”
Steve Rosen, a former AIPAC foreign policy chief who now trains Europeans in pro-Israel advocacy, said the Democratic Party’s rank and file is likelier to question Israel than it has in the past. “What’s striking is how many of the shtarkers of the Democratic Party are leaving,” Rosen said, using the Yiddish term for “big shot,” “and people coming in have weaker ties and have been subject to a propaganda effort by the Jewish left which has presented to them a set of ideas that are outside the Israeli mainstream.”
Rosen cited the influence of J Street and journalist Peter Beinart, who argues that Israeli policies have alienated young American Jews.
J Street itself claimed that the congressional election results were a “victory,” noting that of 71 congressional candidates backed by J Street’s political action committee, 70 won — all of them Democrats.
Rosen, however, questioned the extent of J Street’s victory. He wrote in an article for Foreign Policy magazine that most of the candidates backed by J Street also were supported by political action committees and individuals aligned with AIPAC.
Ben-Ami, for his part, said the successes of J Street-backed candidates should be seen as not as a diminution of pro-Israel support but of its future shape. “Forty or 50 years ago it was a different relationship than it is today,” he said of the U.S.-Israel relationship. “The interests of the United States and Israel dovetail in a place where you want to see a U.S. policy set that leads into the resolution of this conflict.”

Comments on this Article