Tuesday, July 22, 2014 Tammuz 24, 5774

Calibrating What Effect N.J. Scandals

August 6, 2009 By:
Kenneth H. Ryesky
Posted In 
Comment0

On Aug. 11, 2004, while leading a continuing legal education seminar sponsored by Gratz College, I predicted that charities and other tax-exempt organizations could expect more stringent oversight by the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Congress, and that such official attention would come to affect Jewish communal life.

Unmistakable signals of a coming crackdown had been apparent in the preceding months, including but not limited to speeches and testimony by high-ranking IRS officials. The crackdown on the tax-exempts was launched, and continues apace to this day.

But lately, many of us in the profession have received a nagging hunch that synagogues and other Jewish groups -- particularly those connected with Israel -- were and are being singled out for special attention. We have seen our clients receive more requests for verifications, keener auditor interest in bank records and more detailed queries regarding organizational operations.

The recent mass arrest of politicians and rabbis in New Jersey and Brooklyn, coming on the heels of a tentative plea agreement by a Brooklyn Chasidic rabbinical leader in an unrelated Los Angeles tax-fraud case, effectively confirmed that our fears have been more than just the usual "Jewish paranoia."

The shady dealings of a relative few have, in fact, cast a cloud over Jewish tax-exempt organizations.The IRS has reacted accordingly by working with the FBI to scrutinize more intensely yeshivas and Jewish charities.

The practice of tzedakah is inextricably tied to Jewish life and thought. (Even nonreligious Jews practice charitable giving of one sort or another.) Accordingly, organizations that carry out charitable works have long been integral parts of our community.

Moreover, groups like these are almost always exempt from taxation under the Internal Revenue Code, and donors receive favorable tax-deduction treatment for what they give. Any difficulties in the tax-exempt sector are thus bound to affect the Jewish community.

There's good reason for the authorities to focus on tax-exempt entities. Tax-exempts can be -- and are -- used in tax-evasion schemes. Moreover, information changes hands whenever money does. That information is often invaluable to effective law-enforcement and anti-terrorism activities. Accordingly, keeping watch over the tax-exempt sector has obvious benefits.

To be sure, the recently arrested individuals have yet to be found guilty, and their exoneration would certainly be a most welcome development. But even the mere suspicion of a rabbi or a yeshiva or other Jewish entity redounds to the detriment of the Jewish community at large, if only in the enhanced degree of scrutiny and attention our organizations receive from the taxation and law-enforcement authorities.

American tax-exempt organizations are now playing a new ballgame in a new ballpark. There are more regulations, more interactions with bureaucrats and more chances of losing tax-exempt status for failure to comply with the added rules. Indeed, the IRS has of late been withdrawing the organizations' tax exemptions in greater numbers than in the past (and therefore, tax advantages for the donors). Above all, greater accountability is imposed upon the tax-exempts and the individuals who operate them.

Jewish communal institutions cannot continue with a "business-as-usual" attitude. Their tax-exempt status -- and consequent ability to affect charitable, religious and educational ventures -- is at stake. They now need to operate with more candor, transparency and attention to detail.

Moreover, the various Jewish "umbrella organizations" -- such as synagogue and rabbinical groups, Jewish federations and advocacy organizations -- should go beyond issuing condemnatory statements regarding the recent New Jersey indictments. Such groups need to become unabashed advocates of law abidance and tax compliance by providing their constituent agencies with guidance, education and other programs to foster the proper operation of individual tax-exempt organizations.

There likely will be additional repercussions from the New Jersey indictments. Given the key role played by Jewish tax-exempts, the community's response to the indictments must include addressing -- proactively -- the integrity, reputation and sound workings of its numerous tax-exempt organizations.

Kenneth H. Ryesky is a lawyer who teaches taxation courses at Queens College CUNY. He formerly served as an attorney for the Internal Revenue Service.

 

Comments on this Article

Sign up for our Newsletter

Advertisement